Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
63
Highlights
36
Differences
8
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 511 Nano 3
vs
Anker 312:
63 Highlights & 36 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
An overview focused on which charger offers better sustainability credentials and enhanced protection.
From usb-c ports, wireless charging power, cable length & interchangeable plugs to user experience, we laid out the pros and quirks of Anker 511 Nano 3 vs Anker 312 in one sharp chargers breakdown.
Anker 511 Nano 3 vs Anker 312: Compact Powerhouses for On-the-Go Charging
When it comes to choosing between the Anker 511 Nano 3 and the Anker 312, both chargers appeal to beginners looking for reliable and efficient single-port USB-C charging solutions tailored mainly for indoor use. They share essential safety features like multi-layer protection and fire resistance, alongside consistent charging performance and passive thermal dissipation.
However, their cores diverge significantly in terms of power delivery, portability, and device compatibility. The 511 Nano 3 is a featherweight powerhouse at just 0.1 lbs, designed for charging not only phones but also tablets and even laptops, albeit capped at a modest 30W max output. Conversely, the Anker 312 packs more punch with its 67W fast-charging capability but foregoes laptop compatibility while weighing five times as much and sporting a noisier thermal profile.
Ultra-compact Excellence: The Anker 511 Nano 3's Strengths
The Anker 511 Nano 3 truly shines when portability and ecological considerations dominate your charging needs. With its minimal compact design and ultra-lightweight body, it is tailored for travelers or anyone who needs a charger that barely adds bulk to their gear. Its high environmental sustainability rating and energy-efficient architecture reduce your carbon footprint while keeping devices powered safely. It supports laptop charging, a rare feature in this size class, making it versatile for multiple device types. Its high heat management ensures silent operation; no annoying fan noise; offering a smooth, hassle-free experience. Plus, 24/7 customer support is a great bonus for peace of mind.
Powerhouse for Mobile Fast Charging: What the Anker 312 Brings to the Table
The Anker 312 excels in delivering fast and robust charging, primarily suited for smartphones and tablets. Its impressive peak capability of 67W accelerates charging substantially compared to conventional chargers, supporting fast charging protocols that help reduce downtime for busy users. The charger boasts a sturdy build made from plastic and polycarbonate with drop resistance that withstands accidental bumps and scrapes, while also featuring higher scratch resistance.
Safety hasn't been compromised; it has fast protection response mechanisms and thermal fail-safe modes. The tradeoff for the extra power is its larger size and higher weight (0.5 lbs), combined with a noticeable noise level of about 40 dB during operation, which might be distracting in quiet settings. Still, for users prioritizing fast recharge cycles, this charger is a sensible choice and backed by a generous 1.5-year warranty.
Quick Take
The Anker 511 Nano 3 is a dream for ultra-portable users who want quiet, environmentally conscious charging with the bonus of laptop support. Meanwhile, the Anker 312 offers swift and robust fast charging aimed at mobile devices, featuring a tough exterior and longer warranty, suitable for users who don't mind a bit more bulk and noise in exchange for speed.
Bottom Line
If your charging needs center on portability, quiet operation, and laptop compatibility, the Anker 511 Nano 3 is clearly the smarter pick. However, if you prioritize fast charging speed for smartphones and tablets, desire a more rugged charger, and prefer longer warranty coverage, the Anker 312 is still a compelling contender despite its slightly larger footprint and noisier operation.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 511 Nano 3; Excels in compactness, quietness, sustainability, and versatility with laptop compatibility.
Runner-up: Anker 312; Offers superior fast charging power and durability, better suited for users focused on mobile device speed and ruggedness.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Not sure which smart tech to go for? We compared Anker 511 Nano 3 vs Anker 312 down to every detail — including specs, perks, and what users are really saying.
Both chargers are great for beginners but the 511 Nano 3 is a bit more recent from 2022 which might be preferable.
See more
Product Name
What is the product name?
62
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
62
Anker 312
0Votes
Anker 315
vs
Product Name
The Product Name for Anker 511 Nano 3 is 'Anker 511 Nano 3', whereas for Anker 312 it is 'Anker 315'. The names indicate distinct models, important for identifying the product.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
47
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Wall Charger
47
Anker 312
0Votes
Wall Charger
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety is key and both chargers include short circuit protection which is reassuring for daily use.
See more
Maximum Output Power
What is the maximum output power?
30
Watt
1Votes
67
Watt
0Votes
vs
Maximum Output Power
The Maximum Output Power for Anker 511 Nano 3 is 30 Watts, compared to 67 Watts for Anker 312, so Anker 312 can deliver more than double the power for charging.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
lower
37.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 312 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The maximum output power for the Anker 511 Nano 3 is 30 watts which is lower but still decent for many devices.
See more
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
15
Watt
0Votes
5
Watt
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
The minimum output power is 15 Watt, which supports rapid charging for compatible devices.
Anker 312
Minimum output power of 5 Watts supports basic charging needs for lower power devices.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
10.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Voltage
What is the output voltage?
5
Volt
0Votes
5
Volt
0Votes
vs
Output Voltage
Both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312 have an Output Voltage of 5 Volts, making their voltage specifications identical.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
240
Volt
0Votes
240
Volt
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
The input voltage is 240 Volt, suitable for US and many international electrical standards.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
equal
240.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
50
Hz
0Votes
Anker 312
Designed to operate at an input frequency of 50 Hz, suitable for many global power grids.
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current
How much input current does it draw?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.5
A
0Votes
vs
Input Current
Input Current is unavailable for Anker 511 Nano 3, but Anker 312 supports an input current of 1.5 Amps, which may affect charging speed and compatibility.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
3
A
0Votes
3
A
0Votes
Anker 312
Output current is 3 Amperes, suitable for efficient charging of a wide range of devices.
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
In the battle of Output Current,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
equal
3.00 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.1
Watt
0Votes
Anker 312
Standby power consumption is 0.1 Watt, indicating minimal power use when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Peak Power Handling
What peak power can it handle?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
20
Watt
0Votes
vs
Peak Power Handling
Peak Power Handling is unavailable for Anker 511 Nano 3, while Anker 312 has a peak power handling of 20 Watts, revealing Anker 312's ability to handle power surges.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Power Handling on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
97
Anker 312
0Votes
High
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Efficiency on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
47
Anker 312
0Votes
Medium
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
87
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Excellent
72
Anker 312
0Votes
Good
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Excellent
72
Anker 312
0Votes
Good
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Current Regulation on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Excellent
57
Anker 312
0Votes
Good
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
40 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Regulation on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Low
97
Anker 312
0Votes
Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
72
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Enhanced
87
Anker 312
0Votes
Advanced
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection Rating on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior is Standby for both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, indicating similar energy usage when not actively charging.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
67
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Fast
67
Anker 312
0Votes
Fast
Anker 511 Nano 3
The charging speed is Fast, allowing devices to charge quicker than standard speeds without compromising safety.
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
30
Watt
0Votes
65
Watt
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Maximum charging speed reaches 30 Watt, suitable for fast charging most smartphones and smaller laptops.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
lower
35.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Method
How is power distributed?
27
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Fixed
27
Anker 312
0Votes
Fixed
vs
Power Distribution Method
Power Distribution Method is Fixed on both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, meaning the power allocation strategy is similar between devices.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Gradual
97
Anker 312
0Votes
Gradual
Anker 511 Nano 3
Gradual throttling behavior implies that the charger reduces power output smoothly under stress conditions to protect devices and itself.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Consistency
Is charging speed consistent?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Consistent
97
Anker 312
0Votes
Consistent
vs
Charging Consistency
Charging Consistency is rated Consistent for both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, ensuring steady charging performance in each model.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
How many devices can be charged simultaneously?
7
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
1
7
Anker 312
0Votes
1
vs
Simultaneous Device Charging
Both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312 support charging one device simultaneously, limiting multi-device charging capability.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
47
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Stable
47
Anker 312
0Votes
Stable
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Management Efficiency
How efficient is heat management?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
97
Anker 312
0Votes
High
vs
Heat Management Efficiency
Heat Management Efficiency is High for both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, suggesting efficient dissipation of heat during operation.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
87
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
1 Hour
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 312
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
97
Anker 312
0Votes
High
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
ft
0Votes
vs
Cable Length
Cable Length is unavailable for Anker 511 Nano 3 but is 3 feet for Anker 312, indicating Anker 312 provides a cable length specification while the other does not.
Length of the included charging cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 511 Nano 3 has no USB-A ports, while Anker 312 has zero USB-A ports (not explicitly stated as none), effectively both lack USB-A ports but the description varies.
Number of traditional USB-A output ports.
In the battle of USB-A Ports,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
equal
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-A Ports on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Type
What connector types are supported?
87
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
USB-C
87
Anker 312
0Votes
USB-C
Anker 511 Nano 3
The charger utilizes a USB-C connector type, which supports modern charging protocols and reversible plug orientation.
Anker 312
The connector type is USB-C, compatible with most modern devices offering reversible and faster connections.
Types of connectors supported by the charger.
In the battle of Connector Type,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Type on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
No
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
In the battle of Detachable Cable,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Cable on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
57
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Front
57
Anker 312
0Votes
Front
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Placement on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Labeling on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
97
Anker 312
0Votes
High
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Durability on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
97
Anker 312
0Votes
High
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Durability on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
No
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Alignment on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
No
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
In the battle of Daisy-Chain,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daisy-Chain on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
47
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Fixed
47
Anker 312
0Votes
Fixed
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Power Priority on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
7
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
1
7
Anker 312
0Votes
1
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Ports on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 511 Nano 3 is much lighter at 0.1 lbs compared to 0.5 lbs on the 312 so it's easier to carry around.
See more
Height
What is the height of the charger?
1.39
inch
0Votes
3.5
inch
0Votes
vs
Height
The Height of Anker 511 Nano 3 is 1.39 inches, while Anker 312 is 3.5 inches tall, meaning Anker 511 Nano 3 is more compact vertically.
The vertical measurement of the charger from bottom to top.
In the battle of Height,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width of the charger?
1.12
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 312
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Width
Width is 1.12 inches for Anker 511 Nano 3 and unavailable for Anker 312, limiting width comparison to the former only.
The horizontal measurement of the charger body from side to side.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Size Classification
Is this charger travel-sized?
67
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Compact
97
Anker 312
0Votes
Pocket
vs
Travel Size Classification
Anker 511 Nano 3 is classified as Compact for Travel Size Classification, compared to Anker 312 which is Pocket sized, making Anker 312 potentially more portable.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
lower
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Size Classification on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth of the charger?
1.12
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 312
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The front-to-back measurement of the charger body.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Profile Depth
How far does the plug stick out?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 312
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Depth of the plug profile when inserted into an outlet.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Profile Depth on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Material Sustainability Level is High for Anker 511 Nano 3 and Medium for Anker 312, implying more sustainable materials were used in Anker 511 Nano 3.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Sustainability Level on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
87
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Solid
87
Anker 312
0Votes
Solid
Anker 511 Nano 3
The build rigidity is solid, contributing to structural durability and resistance to physical damage.
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
How drop-resistant is the charger?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
ft
0Votes
vs
Drop Resistance
Drop Resistance is unavailable for Anker 511 Nano 3 but rated at 3 feet for Anker 312, indicating Anker 312 can withstand drops from three feet.
Maximum drop height the charger can withstand without damage.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Housing Material
What is the housing material?
37
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Plastic
52
Anker 312
0Votes
Plastic, Polycarbonate
vs
Housing Material
Anker 511 Nano 3 uses Plastic as its Housing Material, while Anker 312 uses a combination of Plastic and Polycarbonate, possibly indicating enhanced durability for Anker 312.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Housing Material on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
7
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Plastic
87
Anker 312
0Votes
Metal
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
lower
80 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Reinforced
97
Anker 312
0Votes
Reinforced
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat-Resistant Materials
Does it use heat-resistant materials?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
vs
Heat-Resistant Materials
Both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312 contain Heat-Resistant Materials, contributing to better thermal management in both devices.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
In the battle of Heat-Resistant Materials,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat-Resistant Materials on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
97
Anker 312
0Votes
V-0
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
37
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Matte
37
Anker 312
0Votes
Matte
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance
How scratch-resistant is it?
37
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Medium
77
Anker 312
0Votes
High
vs
Scratch Resistance
Scratch Resistance is Medium for Anker 511 Nano 3 and High for Anker 312, suggesting Anker 312 is more resistant to scratches.
Resistance of the surface to scratches and abrasions.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
lower
40 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
None
97
Anker 312
0Votes
Splash-Resistant
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
lower
97 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312 feature Thermal Fail-Safe Mode, safeguarding against thermal faults effectively in both devices.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Redundancy Level
What is the safety redundancy level?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Multi-Layer
97
Anker 312
0Votes
Multi-Layer
vs
Safety Redundancy Level
Safety Redundancy Level is Multi-Layer for both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, showing both models have robust layered safety features.
Indicates the number of safety systems working together.
In the battle of Safety Redundancy Level,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Redundancy Level on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
No
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Child Safety Shutter
Is there a child safety shutter?
No
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
vs
Child Safety Shutter
Neither Anker 511 Nano 3 nor Anker 312 include a Child Safety Shutter, so child safety through this feature is absent for both.
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Shutter on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
In the battle of Anti-Spark Protection,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Protection Response Time
How fast does protection activate?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
57
Anker 312
0Votes
Fast
vs
Protection Response Time
Protection Response Time is unavailable for Anker 511 Nano 3, but Fast for Anker 312, indicating Anker 312 reacts more quickly to protection triggers.
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protection Response Time on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
57
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Enhanced
57
Anker 312
0Votes
Enhanced
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility is supported by both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, ensuring functionality with older devices.
Maintains compatibility with older charging standards and devices.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Cross-Brand Compatibility
How broad is cross-brand compatibility?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Universal
62
Anker 312
0Votes
Wide
vs
Cross-Brand Compatibility
Cross-Brand Compatibility is Universal for Anker 511 Nano 3 and Wide for Anker 312, meaning Anker 511 Nano 3 offers broader compatibility across brands.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging
Can it charge laptops?
Yes
1Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
vs
Laptop Charging
Laptop Charging is supported by Anker 511 Nano 3 but not by Anker 312, which may make Anker 511 Nano 3 better suited for laptop users.
Indicates whether the charger can power laptops.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
42 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Laptop Charging,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 312 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The 511 Nano 3 supports laptop charging which is a big plus if you need power for bigger devices.
See more
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
In the battle of PPS,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
42 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging Standard
Which wireless charging standard is supported?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 312
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Android Charging on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Charging on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Both maintain stable sustained load temperatures which means they should perform reliably without overheating.
See more
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
77
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Heat Sink
67
Anker 312
0Votes
Thermal Pads
Anker 511 Nano 3
Internal cooling design uses a heat sink to passively dissipate heat, enhancing thermal management.
Anker 312
Internal cooling design uses thermal pads to effectively dissipate heat without moving components, enhancing reliability.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
72
Anker 312
0Votes
-4–140°F
Anker 312
Storage temperature range from -4 to 140°F (-20 to 60°C) covers typical conditions for safe transportation and storage.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
27
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Passive
27
Anker 312
0Votes
Passive
vs
Thermal Dissipation Method
Thermal Dissipation Method is Passive for both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, meaning both rely on passive cooling techniques.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
How noisy is the charger?
0
dB
0Votes
40
dB
0Votes
vs
Noise Level
Noise Level is 0 dB for Anker 511 Nano 3 and 40 dB for Anker 312, so Anker 511 Nano 3 operates silently compared to Anker 312.
Operational noise produced during charging.
In the battle of Noise Level,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling Threshold
At what temperature does throttling occur?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
140
°F
0Votes
vs
Thermal Throttling Threshold
Thermal Throttling Threshold is unavailable for Anker 511 Nano 3 but set at 140°F for Anker 312, limiting this thermal performance detail to Anker 312.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling Threshold on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
7
Anker 312
0Votes
Sea level–10,000 ft
Anker 312
Operating altitude ranges from sea level up to 10,000 feet (3048 meters), allowing reliable use in various geographic elevations.
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
17
Anker 312
0Votes
32–95°F
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
47
Anker 312
0Votes
Medium
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat
How much energy is lost as heat?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
87
Anker 312
0Votes
Low
vs
Energy Loss as Heat
Energy Loss as Heat is unavailable for Anker 511 Nano 3, but Low for Anker 312, indicating Anker 312 is more efficient in energy use and heat loss.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Loss as Heat on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Stress Resistance is High for Anker 511 Nano 3 and Medium for Anker 312, indicating Anker 511 Nano 3 is more resilient under harsh conditions.
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Stress Resistance on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Manufacturing Quality Level
What is the manufacturing quality level?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Premium
97
Anker 312
0Votes
Premium
vs
Manufacturing Quality Level
Manufacturing Quality Level is Premium for both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, reflecting high build quality in both models.
Overall manufacturing quality classification.
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturing Quality Level on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Stable
97
Anker 312
0Votes
Stable
Anker 511 Nano 3
Long-term stability ensures reliable performance over time without significant degradation in output or safety.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
In the battle of Long-Term Stability,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Mean Time Between Failures
How reliable is the charger over time?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
97
Anker 312
0Votes
High
vs
Mean Time Between Failures
Mean Time Between Failures is High for both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, indicating reliable performance from both units.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
97
Anker 312
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
97
Anker 312
0Votes
High
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
42 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Loss Rating is Low for both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, indicating minimal energy is lost during operation.
Indicates the amount of input power lost during conversion and operation.
In the battle of Power Loss Rating,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Loss Rating on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Efficiency Rating
What is the energy efficiency rating?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
97
Anker 312
0Votes
High
vs
Energy Efficiency Rating
Energy Efficiency Rating is High for both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312, showing that both devices are designed to minimize energy waste.
Overall classification of how efficiently the charger converts power.
In the battle of Energy Efficiency Rating,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Star Compliance
Is it Energy Star compliant?
No
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Indicates compliance with Energy Star efficiency standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Star Compliance on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Efficiency
How efficient is the charger in standby mode?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
High
97
Anker 312
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently the charger uses power while plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Efficiency,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
same as
Anker 312 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Efficiency on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Green Materials Usage
Are green materials used?
No
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
No
0Votes
Anker 312
Uses environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Green Materials Usage on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Carbon Footprint Category
What is the carbon footprint category?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
0Votes
Low
47
Anker 312
0Votes
Medium
vs
Carbon Footprint Category
Carbon Footprint Category is Low for Anker 511 Nano 3 but Medium for Anker 312, suggesting Anker 511 Nano 3 is more environmentally friendly.
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Saving Features
Does it have energy-saving features?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
Yes
0Votes
Anker 312
vs
Energy Saving Features
Both Anker 511 Nano 3 and Anker 312 include Energy Saving Features, promoting reduced power consumption during use.
Built-in features designed to reduce energy consumption.
In the battle of Energy Saving Features,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Saving Features on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 511 Nano 3
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
45
Anker 312
0Votes
1,5 Years
vs
Warranty Length
Warranty Length is unavailable for Anker 511 Nano 3 but stated as '1,5 Years' for Anker 312, showing only Anker 312 provides explicit warranty duration information.
Duration of warranty coverage provided with the charger.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels for Anker 511 Nano 3 include Email, Phone, Chat, and Online Portal, while Anker 312 offers Email and Online Portal only, giving Anker 511 Nano 3 more support options.
Ways users can contact customer support.
In the battle of Support Channels,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉
vs Anker 312 ◉ and help others decide!
Customer Support Availability
When is customer support available?
97
Anker 511 Nano 3
1Votes
24/7
47
Anker 312
0Votes
Business Hours
vs
Customer Support Availability
Customer Support Availability is 24/7 for Anker 511 Nano 3, compared to Business Hours for Anker 312, meaning Anker 511 Nano 3 offers more accessible customer support.
Availability of customer support services.
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ is
better than
Anker 312 ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Customer Support Availability,
Anker 511 Nano 3 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 312 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
